Compare
Acodei vs sush.io
Both tools do the same core job: get Stripe activity into QuickBooks Online without manual entry. sush.io competes on price, at $89 per year on annual billing. Acodei competes on depth, at $12 per month or $120 per year. Compared annually, the gap is $31. Here is what that $31 buys.
Quick verdict
Choose Acodei if
Choose Acodei if you need transaction-level detail rather than payout-grouped totals: Stripe invoices with line items, Stripe Billing subscriptions with proration and dunning, rule-based product mapping on Stripe Product ID or Price ID or metadata, class tracking, multicurrency payouts, or clean handling of disputes, holds, and reserves.
Choose sush.io if
Choose sush.io if you want the lowest possible price for a working Stripe to QuickBooks Online sync, your Stripe activity is straightforward flat-rate charges, you do not need invoice or subscription detail in QuickBooks, or you also run Etsy or Braintree and want them on the same subscription.
Feature-by-feature comparison
| Feature | Acodei | sush.io |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Stripe to QuickBooks Online, transaction-level | Stripe, Etsy, and Braintree to QuickBooks Online, payout-grouped |
| Starting price (annual) | $120/year (2 months free) | $89/year, advertised as $7.40/month billed yearly |
| Starting price (monthly) | $12/month | Single flat plan, headline pricing quoted on annual billing |
| Sync granularity | Every charge, refund, fee, payout, and dispute as its own entry tied to its Stripe transaction ID | Activity grouped into the payout that settled it, posted as a bank deposit with sales as undeposited funds |
| Payout reconciliation | Automatic via a clearing account that mirrors your Stripe balance | Bank deposit matched to the payout amount; manual payouts route through a clearing account plus a transfer |
| Transaction limits | 100 transactions/month on Scale, higher tiers scale from there | Unlimited transactions on the flat plan |
| Historical data import | Full historical backfill with duplicate detection, included | Full history included on the flat plan |
| Accounting software support | QuickBooks Online only | QuickBooks Online only |
| Payment platform coverage | Stripe only | Stripe, Etsy, Braintree |
| Stripe invoice sync | Full invoice sync with line items, auto-apply payments, credit memos | Not documented publicly |
| Subscription billing (Stripe Billing) | Native support for plan changes, proration, dunning | Not documented publicly |
| Product mapping | Rule-based on Stripe Product ID, Price ID, metadata, value, description | Accounts assigned through automation settings; no documented product-level mapping rules |
| Class tracking | Included on paid plans | Not documented publicly |
| Multi-currency | Invoice and payment multicurrency with Stripe/QBO exchange rates | Not documented publicly |
| Refunds and disputes | Refunds posted individually; disputes and other balance transactions mapped once in Balance Transaction Mapping | Refunds posted as Refund Receipts; disputes posted as expense entries |
See Acodei on your own Stripe data
14-day free trial. Connect Stripe and QuickBooks in under 15 minutes. No credit card required.
The price gap is smaller than the positioning suggests
sush.io leads with price, and the claim is fair: it is the cheapest credible way to get Stripe into QuickBooks Online. The site advertises $7.40 per month billed yearly, which is $89 per year, with unlimited transactions and full history on a single flat plan. It has been running since 2014.
Compare annual to annual and the difference is $31 per year. Acodei is $120 per year on annual billing, which includes the same two months free framing. That is roughly the cost of one billable hour for most bookkeepers.
That framing matters because the real question is not which subscription is cheaper. It is whether the cheaper sync creates work somewhere else. If your Stripe activity is 40 flat-rate charges a month with no invoices, no subscriptions, and one currency, it very likely does not, and the $31 stays in your pocket. If your month-end involves chasing which charges made up a payout, the $31 is not the number that decides this.
Payout-grouped vs transaction-level: what your books actually look like
This is the mechanical difference, and it drives most of the rest.
sush.io organizes around the payout. Its documentation describes creating a bank deposit in QuickBooks matching the amount received in your bank account, with sales consolidated as undeposited funds inside that deposit and Stripe fees included as expenses. If you take manual payouts instead of automatic ones, sales receipts post to a clearing account and a transfer moves the money when the payout happens. Refunds become Refund Receipts, and disputes post as expense entries.
That model reconciles cleanly. Your bank feed shows a deposit, QuickBooks shows a matching deposit, and the fees are accounted for. For a lot of businesses that is genuinely all that is required.
Acodei organizes around the individual Stripe transaction. Every charge, fee, refund, payout, and dispute becomes its own entry tied to its Stripe transaction ID, posted through a clearing account that mirrors your Stripe balance. The payout still reconciles to the bank deposit, but the detail underneath it stays intact.
The practical test is a support question. When a customer asks why they were charged $47.20 rather than $50, or your accountant asks which invoices made up March revenue, transaction-level books answer from the books. Payout-grouped books send you back to the Stripe Dashboard.
Where sush.io is the better choice
There are real cases where paying more would be waste.
If your Stripe usage is simple one-off charges through Stripe Checkout or Payment Links, in a single currency, with no Stripe invoices and no subscriptions, then transaction-level detail is detail you will never query. A payout-grouped deposit with fees split out is a correct set of books.
If you also sell on Etsy or process through Braintree, sush.io covers all three sources on the same flat subscription. Acodei is Stripe only, so a second tool would be needed.
If your transaction count is high but your transaction types are uniform, the unlimited-transactions flat plan is straightforwardly good value. Acodei prices in tiers that start at 100 transactions per month on Scale, so a high-volume, low-complexity business pays more for depth it may not use.
We would rather say that plainly than pretend the cheaper tool is a bad tool.
Want to see how it works on your Stripe data before committing?
Start Free TrialWhere the depth matters: invoices, subscriptions, and multicurrency
sush.io does not publicly document Stripe invoice sync, Stripe Billing subscription handling, product-level mapping rules, class tracking, or multicurrency conversion. We are describing what their public site and help center cover, not asserting that nothing exists behind the login.
Acodei documents all of them, and they are the difference for a certain kind of business.
Stripe invoices sync with their line items, so payments auto-apply against the right invoice and credit memos land correctly. For anyone invoicing through Stripe rather than charging a card at checkout, that is the difference between books that reconcile and an accounts receivable ledger rebuilt by hand.
Stripe Billing subscriptions bring proration on upgrades, failed payment retries, and dunning. A mid-cycle plan change is not one clean charge, and a tool that treats it as one will misstate revenue in both months.
Product mapping in Acodei is rule-based on Stripe Product ID, Price ID, metadata, value, or description, so different products post to different income accounts automatically. Combined with class tracking on paid plans, that is how a multi-product business gets a useful P&L rather than one Sales line.
Reconciliation edge cases and month-end
Standard payouts are the easy part, and both tools handle them.
The divergence shows up in the uncommon balance transactions: disputes, holds, reserves, negative payouts on days when refunds exceed sales, failed payouts that return money to your Stripe balance, and multicurrency payouts where Stripe's conversion rate and QuickBooks' rate differ.
In Acodei, disputes, reserves, and other balance adjustments are mapped once in the Balance Transaction Mapping section of the account mapping page. From there they flow into your daily balance summary or onto the payout deposit itself, depending on whether you post through Undeposited Funds. They are not per-dispute journal entries you assemble by hand each month.
sush.io documents disputes as expense entries and refunds as Refund Receipts, which covers the common cases. Reserves, holds, and multicurrency handling are not covered in its public help center.
If your Stripe account rarely sees anything beyond charges, refunds, and payouts, this section is not your deciding factor. If you have had a month where the clearing account would not tie and you could not find why, it probably is.
Pros and cons
Acodei
Pros
- +Transaction-level detail: every charge, fee, refund, payout, and dispute tied to its Stripe transaction ID
- +Full Stripe invoice sync with line items, auto-apply payments, and credit memos
- +Native Stripe Billing support including proration and dunning
- +Rule-based product mapping on Stripe Product ID, Price ID, metadata, value, or description
- +Documented handling for multicurrency payouts, disputes, holds, and reserves
Cons
- -Costs more: $120 per year on annual billing versus $89
- -Stripe only, so Etsy or Braintree would need a second tool
- -Entry tier starts at 100 transactions per month, so very high volume moves you up the pricing tiers
- -More configuration surface than a flat one-setting sync
sush.io
Pros
- +Lowest credible price for Stripe to QuickBooks Online sync at $89 per year
- +Unlimited transactions and full history on a single flat plan
- +Etsy and Braintree included on the same subscription alongside Stripe
- +Running since 2014 with a simple, small configuration surface
- +Free trial with no credit card required
Cons
- -Payout-grouped rather than transaction-level, so individual charges are not queryable from the books
- -Stripe invoice sync and Stripe Billing subscription handling are not documented publicly
- -No documented product-level mapping rules, class tracking, or multicurrency conversion
- -Public help center does not cover reserves, holds, or negative payouts
- -QuickBooks Online only, with no Xero or QuickBooks Desktop path
Frequently asked questions
Is sush.io cheaper than Acodei?
Yes. sush.io is $89 per year on annual billing, advertised as $7.40 per month billed yearly. Acodei is $120 per year on annual billing, or $12 per month. Compared annually that is a $31 difference. The more useful question is whether payout-grouped books create manual work later that the $31 would have avoided.
Does sush.io record individual Stripe transactions in QuickBooks Online?
Not as individual entries. Its documentation describes grouping activity into the payout that settled it and creating a bank deposit matching the amount received in your bank, with sales consolidated as undeposited funds and fees included as expenses. Refunds post as Refund Receipts and disputes as expense entries. Acodei posts each Stripe transaction separately, tied to its transaction ID.
Does either tool work with Xero or QuickBooks Desktop?
No. Both are QuickBooks Online only. sush.io connects Stripe, Etsy, and Braintree to QuickBooks Online, and Acodei connects Stripe to QuickBooks Online. If your books run on Xero or QuickBooks Desktop, neither tool fits and you would need a different option such as Commerce Sync.
Can I import historical Stripe data with each tool?
Both include it. sush.io advertises full history on its flat plan. Acodei runs a full historical backfill with duplicate detection, which matters if you already have Stripe deposits categorized in QuickBooks from a bank feed and do not want a second copy of that income.
What happens to Stripe invoices and subscriptions in each tool?
Acodei syncs Stripe invoices with their line items so payments auto-apply and credit memos post correctly, and supports Stripe Billing subscriptions including proration and dunning. sush.io does not document invoice or subscription handling publicly. If you invoice through Stripe or run recurring billing, verify this directly before choosing on price.
Which should I choose if I have disputes and multicurrency payouts?
Acodei documents handling for both. Disputes and other balance adjustments are mapped once in Balance Transaction Mapping and flow onto your daily balance summary or the payout deposit. Multicurrency payouts are handled with Stripe and QuickBooks exchange rates. sush.io documents disputes as expense entries but does not cover reserves, holds, or multicurrency in its public help center.
Migration support
Switching from sush.io is straightforward
Moving to Acodei does not mean losing your history. Connect Stripe and QuickBooks Online in minutes, standardize your mappings, and use Historical Data Import to backfill past Stripe activity so your books stay continuous. Our team can help you plan the cutover — see the step-by-step migration guide, or talk to us about a done-for-you setup.
- Keep your Stripe history with historical transaction backfill
- Re-create product and class mappings once, then sync automatically
- Start with a 14-day free trial and cancel anytime
Managing migrations for multiple clients? See how Acodei supports accountants and bookkeeping firms.
Ready to try Acodei?
Connect Stripe to QuickBooks Online in minutes. Free trial, no credit card required.
Want more detail? Read our full written comparison on the blog.